Bug #693

Better sanity check for invalid BOM type

Added by Kevin Woo about 5 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:AssignedStart date:10/02/2009
Priority:TabledDue date:
Assignee:John Sexton% Done:


Target version:-


assert would be nice


#1 Updated by John Sexton about 4 years ago

Kevin/Austin what does this mean?

#2 Updated by John Sexton about 4 years ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to Tabled

#3 Updated by Kevin Woo about 4 years ago

When initializing the BOM, either as an 1.0 or 1.5 there isn't a good check.
Ie: I could put like 4 or something like that (I don't remember the
specifics of how the version are represented). Basically you should make
sure it's one of those versions and not some number someone made up.

#4 Updated by Alex Zirbel about 4 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Austin Buchan to John Sexton

Need to check if this issue was fixed.

Also available in: Atom PDF